Review




Structured Review

OriginLab corp double-exponential decay function
Double Exponential Decay Function, supplied by OriginLab corp, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/double-exponential decay function/product/OriginLab corp
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
double-exponential decay function - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars

Images



Similar Products

90
OriginLab corp double-exponential decay function
Double Exponential Decay Function, supplied by OriginLab corp, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/double-exponential decay function/product/OriginLab corp
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
double-exponential decay function - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
OriginLab corp double exponential decay function fitting origin 7.5
Double Exponential Decay Function Fitting Origin 7.5, supplied by OriginLab corp, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/double exponential decay function fitting origin 7.5/product/OriginLab corp
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
double exponential decay function fitting origin 7.5 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
GraphPad Software Inc double exponential function
Confocal microscopic analysis of enhancer activity of mSE078 fragments using PCP-PP7 system in MEF cells. ( A ) Left: Schematic representation of mkrn1 P -12 × PP7-SE reporter plasmid construct. Right: Schematic representation of PCP-PP7 system used in this study. ( B ) Confocal microscopic analysis of tdPCP-CFP (transcript), SOX2-mCherry and p300-GFP signals in MEF cells. Cells were imaged after 24 h-post transfections of four plasmids. Left: 40× magnification images; Right: closed-up images of single cells. ( C ) Quantification of CFP (PCP), mCherry (SOX2) and GFP (p300) foci. Error bars indicate standard errors of means (SEM) from at least 15 nuclei. Quantification was done using ImageJ software. Particle size larger than 2 × 2 μm 2 was calculated. ( D ) Pearson's coefficients of CFP and GFP signals to mCherry signals. Pearson's coefficients were calculated using ImageJ software. Error bars indicate SEMs from ten nuclei. ( E ) Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) measuring SOX2-mCherry condensates in MEF cells co-transfected with PCP-CFP, SOX2-mCherry and p300-GFP plasmids. Photobleaching was initiated at 0 s. Curve shows mean (red dot) and SEM (black bar) of mCherry intensity of five regions. FRAP recovery curves were fitted to the double <t>exponential</t> function. P -values were calculated using one-way ANOVA. (ns) P < 0.1234; (*) P < 0.0332; (**) P < 0.0021; (***) P < 0.0002; (****) P < 0.0001.
Double Exponential Function, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/double exponential function/product/GraphPad Software Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
double exponential function - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
OriginLab corp double exponential function
Incremental stress–strain curves. ( A ) Strain versus time curve for electrospun 75:25 fibrinogen:PCL fiber. The fiber was pulled to a small strain (~10%) and held constant for approximately 30–40 s; this process was repeated with a slightly larger strain at each time. ( B ) Stress versus time curve. At constant strain, the stress relaxes and decays exponentially with time. ( C ) Representative stress relaxation curves. A double <t>exponential</t> curve is fitted to the relaxation curve (R 2 = 0.99) to determine the relaxation times. The fast and slow relaxation times for this curve were 1.8 s and 21 s. ( D ) Moduli versus strain curve. The total modulus, Y tot , (stars) and relaxed, elastic modulus, Y 0 , (dots) decrease as the strain increases. ( E ) The graph shows statistical differences between the slow and fast relaxation times of the fibers with two different ratios. The fiber diameter was 99 nm. ** indicates a p -value < 0.01; **** indicates a p -value < 0.0001.
Double Exponential Function, supplied by OriginLab corp, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/double exponential function/product/OriginLab corp
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
double exponential function - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MathWorks Inc double-exponential fitting function
Incremental stress–strain curves. ( A ) Strain versus time curve for electrospun 75:25 fibrinogen:PCL fiber. The fiber was pulled to a small strain (~10%) and held constant for approximately 30–40 s; this process was repeated with a slightly larger strain at each time. ( B ) Stress versus time curve. At constant strain, the stress relaxes and decays exponentially with time. ( C ) Representative stress relaxation curves. A double <t>exponential</t> curve is fitted to the relaxation curve (R 2 = 0.99) to determine the relaxation times. The fast and slow relaxation times for this curve were 1.8 s and 21 s. ( D ) Moduli versus strain curve. The total modulus, Y tot , (stars) and relaxed, elastic modulus, Y 0 , (dots) decrease as the strain increases. ( E ) The graph shows statistical differences between the slow and fast relaxation times of the fibers with two different ratios. The fiber diameter was 99 nm. ** indicates a p -value < 0.01; **** indicates a p -value < 0.0001.
Double Exponential Fitting Function, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/double-exponential fitting function/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
double-exponential fitting function - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Meira Corporation double exponential function
Incremental stress–strain curves. ( A ) Strain versus time curve for electrospun 75:25 fibrinogen:PCL fiber. The fiber was pulled to a small strain (~10%) and held constant for approximately 30–40 s; this process was repeated with a slightly larger strain at each time. ( B ) Stress versus time curve. At constant strain, the stress relaxes and decays exponentially with time. ( C ) Representative stress relaxation curves. A double <t>exponential</t> curve is fitted to the relaxation curve (R 2 = 0.99) to determine the relaxation times. The fast and slow relaxation times for this curve were 1.8 s and 21 s. ( D ) Moduli versus strain curve. The total modulus, Y tot , (stars) and relaxed, elastic modulus, Y 0 , (dots) decrease as the strain increases. ( E ) The graph shows statistical differences between the slow and fast relaxation times of the fibers with two different ratios. The fiber diameter was 99 nm. ** indicates a p -value < 0.01; **** indicates a p -value < 0.0001.
Double Exponential Function, supplied by Meira Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/double exponential function/product/Meira Corporation
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
double exponential function - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MathWorks Inc double exponential function
Incremental stress–strain curves. ( A ) Strain versus time curve for electrospun 75:25 fibrinogen:PCL fiber. The fiber was pulled to a small strain (~10%) and held constant for approximately 30–40 s; this process was repeated with a slightly larger strain at each time. ( B ) Stress versus time curve. At constant strain, the stress relaxes and decays exponentially with time. ( C ) Representative stress relaxation curves. A double <t>exponential</t> curve is fitted to the relaxation curve (R 2 = 0.99) to determine the relaxation times. The fast and slow relaxation times for this curve were 1.8 s and 21 s. ( D ) Moduli versus strain curve. The total modulus, Y tot , (stars) and relaxed, elastic modulus, Y 0 , (dots) decrease as the strain increases. ( E ) The graph shows statistical differences between the slow and fast relaxation times of the fibers with two different ratios. The fiber diameter was 99 nm. ** indicates a p -value < 0.01; **** indicates a p -value < 0.0001.
Double Exponential Function, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/double exponential function/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
double exponential function - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Confocal microscopic analysis of enhancer activity of mSE078 fragments using PCP-PP7 system in MEF cells. ( A ) Left: Schematic representation of mkrn1 P -12 × PP7-SE reporter plasmid construct. Right: Schematic representation of PCP-PP7 system used in this study. ( B ) Confocal microscopic analysis of tdPCP-CFP (transcript), SOX2-mCherry and p300-GFP signals in MEF cells. Cells were imaged after 24 h-post transfections of four plasmids. Left: 40× magnification images; Right: closed-up images of single cells. ( C ) Quantification of CFP (PCP), mCherry (SOX2) and GFP (p300) foci. Error bars indicate standard errors of means (SEM) from at least 15 nuclei. Quantification was done using ImageJ software. Particle size larger than 2 × 2 μm 2 was calculated. ( D ) Pearson's coefficients of CFP and GFP signals to mCherry signals. Pearson's coefficients were calculated using ImageJ software. Error bars indicate SEMs from ten nuclei. ( E ) Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) measuring SOX2-mCherry condensates in MEF cells co-transfected with PCP-CFP, SOX2-mCherry and p300-GFP plasmids. Photobleaching was initiated at 0 s. Curve shows mean (red dot) and SEM (black bar) of mCherry intensity of five regions. FRAP recovery curves were fitted to the double exponential function. P -values were calculated using one-way ANOVA. (ns) P < 0.1234; (*) P < 0.0332; (**) P < 0.0021; (***) P < 0.0002; (****) P < 0.0001.

Journal: Nucleic Acids Research

Article Title: Molecular basis for SOX2-dependent regulation of super-enhancer activity

doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad908

Figure Lengend Snippet: Confocal microscopic analysis of enhancer activity of mSE078 fragments using PCP-PP7 system in MEF cells. ( A ) Left: Schematic representation of mkrn1 P -12 × PP7-SE reporter plasmid construct. Right: Schematic representation of PCP-PP7 system used in this study. ( B ) Confocal microscopic analysis of tdPCP-CFP (transcript), SOX2-mCherry and p300-GFP signals in MEF cells. Cells were imaged after 24 h-post transfections of four plasmids. Left: 40× magnification images; Right: closed-up images of single cells. ( C ) Quantification of CFP (PCP), mCherry (SOX2) and GFP (p300) foci. Error bars indicate standard errors of means (SEM) from at least 15 nuclei. Quantification was done using ImageJ software. Particle size larger than 2 × 2 μm 2 was calculated. ( D ) Pearson's coefficients of CFP and GFP signals to mCherry signals. Pearson's coefficients were calculated using ImageJ software. Error bars indicate SEMs from ten nuclei. ( E ) Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) measuring SOX2-mCherry condensates in MEF cells co-transfected with PCP-CFP, SOX2-mCherry and p300-GFP plasmids. Photobleaching was initiated at 0 s. Curve shows mean (red dot) and SEM (black bar) of mCherry intensity of five regions. FRAP recovery curves were fitted to the double exponential function. P -values were calculated using one-way ANOVA. (ns) P < 0.1234; (*) P < 0.0332; (**) P < 0.0021; (***) P < 0.0002; (****) P < 0.0001.

Article Snippet: FRAP recovery curves were fitted to the double exponential function in GraphPad Prism software v.8.3.0 (GraphPad software, Boston, MA, USA).

Techniques: Activity Assay, Plasmid Preparation, Construct, Transfection, Software, Fluorescence

Incremental stress–strain curves. ( A ) Strain versus time curve for electrospun 75:25 fibrinogen:PCL fiber. The fiber was pulled to a small strain (~10%) and held constant for approximately 30–40 s; this process was repeated with a slightly larger strain at each time. ( B ) Stress versus time curve. At constant strain, the stress relaxes and decays exponentially with time. ( C ) Representative stress relaxation curves. A double exponential curve is fitted to the relaxation curve (R 2 = 0.99) to determine the relaxation times. The fast and slow relaxation times for this curve were 1.8 s and 21 s. ( D ) Moduli versus strain curve. The total modulus, Y tot , (stars) and relaxed, elastic modulus, Y 0 , (dots) decrease as the strain increases. ( E ) The graph shows statistical differences between the slow and fast relaxation times of the fibers with two different ratios. The fiber diameter was 99 nm. ** indicates a p -value < 0.01; **** indicates a p -value < 0.0001.

Journal: Nanomaterials

Article Title: The Mechanical Properties of Blended Fibrinogen:Polycaprolactone (PCL) Nanofibers

doi: 10.3390/nano13081359

Figure Lengend Snippet: Incremental stress–strain curves. ( A ) Strain versus time curve for electrospun 75:25 fibrinogen:PCL fiber. The fiber was pulled to a small strain (~10%) and held constant for approximately 30–40 s; this process was repeated with a slightly larger strain at each time. ( B ) Stress versus time curve. At constant strain, the stress relaxes and decays exponentially with time. ( C ) Representative stress relaxation curves. A double exponential curve is fitted to the relaxation curve (R 2 = 0.99) to determine the relaxation times. The fast and slow relaxation times for this curve were 1.8 s and 21 s. ( D ) Moduli versus strain curve. The total modulus, Y tot , (stars) and relaxed, elastic modulus, Y 0 , (dots) decrease as the strain increases. ( E ) The graph shows statistical differences between the slow and fast relaxation times of the fibers with two different ratios. The fiber diameter was 99 nm. ** indicates a p -value < 0.01; **** indicates a p -value < 0.0001.

Article Snippet: Individual stress relaxation curves were fitted to this double exponential function in Origin (OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA).

Techniques: